<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Wireless Surround Systems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wirelesssurroundsystemsonline.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wirelesssurroundsystemsonline.com</link>
	<description>Find The Best Deals on Wireless Surround Sound Systems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 23:21:24 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Q&amp;A: How to block sound waves from coming through computer speakers? by onegammyleg</title>
		<link>http://www.wirelesssurroundsystemsonline.com/2414/computer-speakers-systems/qa-how-to-block-sound-waves-from-coming-through-computer-speakers.html/comment-page-1#comment-2174</link>
		<dc:creator>onegammyleg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 23:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wirelesssurroundsystemsonline.com/2414/computer-speakers-systems/qa-how-to-block-sound-waves-from-coming-through-computer-speakers.html#comment-2174</guid>
		<description>flapjack said ¨report over modulation to the FCC. If you informed him of the issue and won&#039;t take care of it, they will.¨

What a stoopid bit of advice that is. ! ! !
It is MOST likely that the ham station is complying with ALL of the laws set out by the government.

Just because of the flood of NON compliant audio equipment (phones , tv&#039;s , sterio&#039;s and computer products) that is no reason to blame a nearby radio amateur for the interference.
In fact the radio amateur is not under any obligation to fix YOUR interference issue from poor equipment.

BUT -- fortunately most hams are good guys and if you go and see them and ask for interference reduction advice he is more than likely to help you out.

Older tv&#039;s were built to lower standards regarding strong signal rejection - so there may not be a lot that can be done with that.

Amplified computer speakers are often housed in plastic boxes and run unshielded (or poorly shielded) cable between the computer and the speakers.

This allows radio frequency energy to enter those parts and make the interference.
It is a problem with those parts and not the radio ham.
It can be helped by adding metal shielding inside the plastic speaker boxes and running new high quality cable from the amplified speakers to the sound card outlet.

Go ask the ham , he probably will like the challenge to fix your problem.

If he is a CB&#039;er and has that sort of range he probably is running illegal power levels which is against the law.
Find out what and who he is first.

So - If he&#039;s a ham , work it out with him .. if he&#039;s a CB&#039;er , probably call the FCC.

http://www.swdxer.co.nr/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>flapjack said ¨report over modulation to the FCC. If you informed him of the issue and won&#8217;t take care of it, they will.¨</p>
<p>What a stoopid bit of advice that is. ! ! !<br />
It is MOST likely that the ham station is complying with ALL of the laws set out by the government.</p>
<p>Just because of the flood of NON compliant audio equipment (phones , tv&#8217;s , sterio&#8217;s and computer products) that is no reason to blame a nearby radio amateur for the interference.<br />
In fact the radio amateur is not under any obligation to fix YOUR interference issue from poor equipment.</p>
<p>BUT &#8212; fortunately most hams are good guys and if you go and see them and ask for interference reduction advice he is more than likely to help you out.</p>
<p>Older tv&#8217;s were built to lower standards regarding strong signal rejection &#8211; so there may not be a lot that can be done with that.</p>
<p>Amplified computer speakers are often housed in plastic boxes and run unshielded (or poorly shielded) cable between the computer and the speakers.</p>
<p>This allows radio frequency energy to enter those parts and make the interference.<br />
It is a problem with those parts and not the radio ham.<br />
It can be helped by adding metal shielding inside the plastic speaker boxes and running new high quality cable from the amplified speakers to the sound card outlet.</p>
<p>Go ask the ham , he probably will like the challenge to fix your problem.</p>
<p>If he is a CB&#8217;er and has that sort of range he probably is running illegal power levels which is against the law.<br />
Find out what and who he is first.</p>
<p>So &#8211; If he&#8217;s a ham , work it out with him .. if he&#8217;s a CB&#8217;er , probably call the FCC.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.swdxer.co.nr/" rel="nofollow">http://www.swdxer.co.nr/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Q&amp;A: How to block sound waves from coming through computer speakers? by flapjack</title>
		<link>http://www.wirelesssurroundsystemsonline.com/2414/computer-speakers-systems/qa-how-to-block-sound-waves-from-coming-through-computer-speakers.html/comment-page-1#comment-2173</link>
		<dc:creator>flapjack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 22:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wirelesssurroundsystemsonline.com/2414/computer-speakers-systems/qa-how-to-block-sound-waves-from-coming-through-computer-speakers.html#comment-2173</guid>
		<description>better cables or report over modulation to the FCC. If you informed him of the issue and won&#039;t take care of it, they will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>better cables or report over modulation to the FCC. If you informed him of the issue and won&#8217;t take care of it, they will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Q&amp;A: How to block sound waves from coming through computer speakers? by romulusnr</title>
		<link>http://www.wirelesssurroundsystemsonline.com/2414/computer-speakers-systems/qa-how-to-block-sound-waves-from-coming-through-computer-speakers.html/comment-page-1#comment-2172</link>
		<dc:creator>romulusnr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 22:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wirelesssurroundsystemsonline.com/2414/computer-speakers-systems/qa-how-to-block-sound-waves-from-coming-through-computer-speakers.html#comment-2172</guid>
		<description>You probably need to find a way to shield all the wires for your speakers. I dunno if you can just get wire shielding for existing wires. Tinfoil wrapped around them might help but might look like crap. You may need to shield the speakers themselves if they are cheap; most decent speakers are already shielded -- but the wires usually aren&#039;t, at least not for home systems. (Kinda surprising considering the kind of rf interference we have around the home these days.) Not sure this will necessarily alleviate the problem but if the speakers or wires are picking up his signal then shielding them should prevent rogue signals from getting into them.

The wires or speakers are picking up his signal at a consistent strength. This would be why you can minimize the effect by amplifying the outputs and keeping the speakers&#039; volume control low -- you&#039;re sending the speakers a stronger signal from your computer and reducing the speaker amplification to compensate, but you&#039;re asking for poorer sound quality as the equalizer jacked up too high will cause clipping. The wires or speakers themselves are picking up the signal, so for example its not the computer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You probably need to find a way to shield all the wires for your speakers. I dunno if you can just get wire shielding for existing wires. Tinfoil wrapped around them might help but might look like crap. You may need to shield the speakers themselves if they are cheap; most decent speakers are already shielded &#8212; but the wires usually aren&#8217;t, at least not for home systems. (Kinda surprising considering the kind of rf interference we have around the home these days.) Not sure this will necessarily alleviate the problem but if the speakers or wires are picking up his signal then shielding them should prevent rogue signals from getting into them.</p>
<p>The wires or speakers are picking up his signal at a consistent strength. This would be why you can minimize the effect by amplifying the outputs and keeping the speakers&#8217; volume control low &#8212; you&#8217;re sending the speakers a stronger signal from your computer and reducing the speaker amplification to compensate, but you&#8217;re asking for poorer sound quality as the equalizer jacked up too high will cause clipping. The wires or speakers themselves are picking up the signal, so for example its not the computer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best surround sound system for me.? by Solarisphere</title>
		<link>http://www.wirelesssurroundsystemsonline.com/2412/samsung-bluetooth-surround-sound/best-surround-sound-system-for-me.html/comment-page-1#comment-2171</link>
		<dc:creator>Solarisphere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wirelesssurroundsystemsonline.com/2412/samsung-bluetooth-surround-sound/best-surround-sound-system-for-me.html#comment-2171</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ll be looking at home theatre in a box setups. Some of them are &quot;wireless&quot; I believe, however they will have to be powered so you&#039;ll need a power cable running to them (unless they take batteries, which seems unlikely).

They will all be connected to a receiver (a central box that controls all the audio and video). The receiver should have all the necessary inputs, and maybe even bluetooth connectivity. The speakers might be connected wirelessly to the receiver, but not directly to the components.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ll be looking at home theatre in a box setups. Some of them are &#8220;wireless&#8221; I believe, however they will have to be powered so you&#8217;ll need a power cable running to them (unless they take batteries, which seems unlikely).</p>
<p>They will all be connected to a receiver (a central box that controls all the audio and video). The receiver should have all the necessary inputs, and maybe even bluetooth connectivity. The speakers might be connected wirelessly to the receiver, but not directly to the components.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CES 2008: Razer Mako 2.1 THX Surround Sound by Nuffedyr</title>
		<link>http://www.wirelesssurroundsystemsonline.com/2411/2-1-surround-sound/ces-2008-razer-mako-2-1-thx-surround-sound.html/comment-page-1#comment-2170</link>
		<dc:creator>Nuffedyr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wirelesssurroundsystemsonline.com/2411/2-1-surround-sound/ces-2008-razer-mako-2-1-thx-surround-sound.html#comment-2170</guid>
		<description>nice its just cost to much for me.. i think u get better surround whit a headset =P i use carcharias</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice its just cost to much for me.. i think u get better surround whit a headset =P i use carcharias</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CES 2008: Razer Mako 2.1 THX Surround Sound by Dudau1991</title>
		<link>http://www.wirelesssurroundsystemsonline.com/2411/2-1-surround-sound/ces-2008-razer-mako-2-1-thx-surround-sound.html/comment-page-1#comment-2169</link>
		<dc:creator>Dudau1991</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wirelesssurroundsystemsonline.com/2411/2-1-surround-sound/ces-2008-razer-mako-2-1-thx-surround-sound.html#comment-2169</guid>
		<description>400 euros in Romania</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>400 euros in Romania</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CES 2008: Razer Mako 2.1 THX Surround Sound by bori58</title>
		<link>http://www.wirelesssurroundsystemsonline.com/2411/2-1-surround-sound/ces-2008-razer-mako-2-1-thx-surround-sound.html/comment-page-1#comment-2168</link>
		<dc:creator>bori58</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wirelesssurroundsystemsonline.com/2411/2-1-surround-sound/ces-2008-razer-mako-2-1-thx-surround-sound.html#comment-2168</guid>
		<description>Just got this system today and I have to say I wish I didn&#039;t. I had a Logitech z 2300 and the sound quality are equal, but the z 2300 blows this system away as far as power even though  Razer states it puts out 300 watts and the z2300 puts out 100 watts less and about $ 150.00 less. Don&#039;t get me wrong if I never had the z 2300 I would probably be real happy with it. 
 I guess its time to box it up, send it back and set the logitech up again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just got this system today and I have to say I wish I didn&#8217;t. I had a Logitech z 2300 and the sound quality are equal, but the z 2300 blows this system away as far as power even though  Razer states it puts out 300 watts and the z2300 puts out 100 watts less and about $ 150.00 less. Don&#8217;t get me wrong if I never had the z 2300 I would probably be real happy with it.<br />
 I guess its time to box it up, send it back and set the logitech up again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CES 2008: Razer Mako 2.1 THX Surround Sound by SymphonyOfDestruct99</title>
		<link>http://www.wirelesssurroundsystemsonline.com/2411/2-1-surround-sound/ces-2008-razer-mako-2-1-thx-surround-sound.html/comment-page-1#comment-2167</link>
		<dc:creator>SymphonyOfDestruct99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wirelesssurroundsystemsonline.com/2411/2-1-surround-sound/ces-2008-razer-mako-2-1-thx-surround-sound.html#comment-2167</guid>
		<description>watts mean the power of the speaker not the SQ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>watts mean the power of the speaker not the SQ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CES 2008: Razer Mako 2.1 THX Surround Sound by bori58</title>
		<link>http://www.wirelesssurroundsystemsonline.com/2411/2-1-surround-sound/ces-2008-razer-mako-2-1-thx-surround-sound.html/comment-page-1#comment-2166</link>
		<dc:creator>bori58</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wirelesssurroundsystemsonline.com/2411/2-1-surround-sound/ces-2008-razer-mako-2-1-thx-surround-sound.html#comment-2166</guid>
		<description>My review is about the sound quality, power and price</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My review is about the sound quality, power and price</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CES 2008: Razer Mako 2.1 THX Surround Sound by SymphonyOfDestruct99</title>
		<link>http://www.wirelesssurroundsystemsonline.com/2411/2-1-surround-sound/ces-2008-razer-mako-2-1-thx-surround-sound.html/comment-page-1#comment-2165</link>
		<dc:creator>SymphonyOfDestruct99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 10:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wirelesssurroundsystemsonline.com/2411/2-1-surround-sound/ces-2008-razer-mako-2-1-thx-surround-sound.html#comment-2165</guid>
		<description>This is the 1st PC speaker ever co-design by THX not just certified by them. Isn&#039;t it charming?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the 1st PC speaker ever co-design by THX not just certified by them. Isn&#8217;t it charming?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
